If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. safe distance from cell tower look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in various possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.